|
Me-323 Motorized 321 Gigant Glider
April 22, 1943 was a black
day for the TG S's. Four days previously the Luftwaffe had lost
24 Ju 52's over the Mediterranean, and 35 other "Aunties"
were so severely damaged that they broke up after emergency
landings. Then the last sixteen aircraft of No. 5 Transport
Squadron took off from Trapani for Tunis, with crews totalling
140 men. The "Giants" were carrying fuel for Rommel's
Africa Corps.
Conceived as a silent glider, and famed as a six-engine monster, Messerschmitt's "Gigant" Me 323 distinguished itself as a cargo plane during World War II, and with its immense size it lived up to its name. Its armament consisted of nine machine guns to which six more could be added in the sides of the fuselage. In 1942, the reestablished Zeppelin aircraft makers had the engineers of Leipheim continue the development of the "Giant" after serial production had begun at Messerschmitt. As earlier, the Zeppelin enthusiasts wanted to make the giant even bigger, and under the designation ZLSO 523, they began work on the design of a larger aircraft, based on the essential features of its Me 323 predecessor. The Allied drive into France-where the project was being carried out in cooperation with the French SNCA.SO company -stopped further work on the super "Giant." Often derided as an "adhesive tape bomber," the Me 323 nevertheless remained a satisfactory combat cargo plane and one of the largest and most bizarre air spectacles in World War II.. ![]() The Messerschmitt "Giants" were viewed
with much suspicion by the German soldiers, even before hair-raising
stories began to be circulated about the young pilots who took
off with a full weight of 99,225 lb. and whose lives, along
with those of their fellow passengers, often depended upon the
copilots' skill at trimming. While the copilot was trimming
the control surfaces, the pilot, with help from the servomechanisms,
struggled with the extremely high control forces. These forces
first became apparent in the Me 321 glider version, and were
never effectively reduced. The bow could be separated into two compartments
accommodating 120 fully equipped infantrymen. De-planing ramps
were included in its equipment. As soon as a "Giant,"
swinging on its rear wheels, was brought into horizontal position,
the cargo shifted to the exact center of gravity and could be
secured.
During the Africa campaign, infantry and wounded, who along with many other loads were often carried in "Giants," shuddered at such stories. "Fly in a thing like that?" one infantryman remarked. "You must be mad!"
"The copilot failed to turn up," one surviver explained, "and because the flight was urgent, the flight captain was assigned an He III man. So we took off, with a fully-loaded weight of about 99,225 lb.; the entire freight space was taken up with vats of fuel for the Me 109's in Budapest. The flight captain couldn't get the plane off the ground, not by an inch. 'Trim her, trim her, she's nose heavy, you idiot! ' he shouted. So the man from the He 111 kept on trimming as if she were tail heavy, and by the time the penny had dropped, the 2,625 ft. runway and a bit more was behind us. Ahead lay a wood. To make it worse, the Me 323's lateral controls were combined with trimming flaps driven by anelectric servomotor in each wing.
|
![]() |
| The Me-321
Gigant was so huge that when needed to land in a field or
pasture, it would be a major job to set up a strip hard and
long enough to allow takeoff. |
One
of the puzzles of aviation history is why Messerschmitt's Gigant
(giant) family set such new standards in air transport capability.
These machines were physically vast, but in terms of weight (under
99,208 lb and power 6,600 hp they were not particularly impressive.
Moreover, they had an old-fashioned fabric-skinned structure,
low flight performance and big doors only at the front. The real
breakthrough came after World War II with the Lockheed C-130,
which had far better payload provisions, a rear door which could
be opened in flight, and high performance. It all makes one wonder
why nobody built a stressed-skin airlifter of Gigant proportions,
powered by four R-2800 Double Wasps.
Instead, the standard transports of World War II were the Junkers
Ju 52 on the one hand and the Douglas
DC-3 family on the other. Both had narrow, cramped fuselages
which sloped steeply on the ground, with a side door. Troops,
infantry weapons, spare parts, ammunition and, with difficulty,
55-Imp gal fuel drums or a motorcycle were possible loads. Anything
really heavy or bulky had to go by surface means. The Soviets
had airlifted trucks and even light tanks, although only by hanging
them out in the slipstream underneath heavy bombers.
This dismal state of affairs probably reflected an almost total
disinterest on the part of the customers. Except on rare occasions,
such as the hurried evacuation of Kabul
in Afghanistan during the winter of 1928-29, there was little
demand for air transport, and it was meekly accepted that transports,
or 'bomber transports', were unable to carry anything heavy or
bulky. Even Hitler's Luftwaffe failed to order any really capable
transport, but nonetheless achieved fantastic success on 10 May
1940 in the invasion of Western Europe using Ju 52/3ms and even
smaller gliders. When it came to the planned invasion of the UK,
such airlift forces appeared inadequate. The initial plan for
Operation Sealion envisaged that, with the RAF defeated, paratroops
and gliderborne infantry could hold bridgeheads, while Ju-87
Stukas would demolish any opposing strongpoints. This plan
was disrupted by the Luftwaffe's failure to eliminate the RAF.
Hitler postponed Sealion, and planned the assault on the Soviet
Union instead, which was expected to be over by the autumn of
1941. With a 'final solution' achieved in the East, Hitler then
planned to occupy the UK.
More careful planning showed that it would be prudent to be able
to bring in heavy armour, flak and other massive items with the
very first airborne assault. With extraordinary suddenness, it
was realized that there was an urgent need for transport aircraft
with capability far greater than anything previously envisaged.
Should they be powered machines or gliders? The instant choice
fell upon gliders., even though these would be unlikely to make
more than one mission each. The need was for large numbers of
heavy assault gliders; a single one-way flight by the whole fleet
ought to be enough.
The
Me 323 gave the Luftwaffe a tremendous airlift capability possessed
by no other air force. Contrary to the insistent Afrika Korps
rumor, the 'Elastoplast bomber' was neither fragile nor highly
inflammable, but a tough giant capable of absorbing tremendous
punishment. There are several RAF squadron combat reports which
tell of a Gigant lumbering on its way after the British aircraft
had expended all its ammunition.
Heavy losses:
There were occasions, however, when Me 323Ds
of various varieties were shot down in droves. The worst time
was April 1943 when it lost 43 aircraft, a single example surviving
the final defeat in Tunisia in mid-May. Of these losses, at least
29 were shot down, the remainder being shot up on airfields. This
drastically reduced the total number of Me 323s available, despite
the fact that output at this time reached almost one per day,
a level never again even approached. (see top of this page)
Operational experience led to numerous internal improvements,
more secure payload positioning which facilitated attainment of
the correct center of gravity position, and the addition of a
retractable rear-fuselage support leg and a massive spade anchor
under the tail to dig in after landing and shorten the run.
Electric servo-motors were added to help operate the flaps, and
later provision was made for up to eight auxiliary take-off rockets
and a 66-ft braking parachute for landing. Take-offs remained
a problem. There was no aircraft of sufficient power available
in numbers, and following rather discouraging model tests the
triple tow was devised with three Messerschmitt Bf -100s all pulling
one Me 321, the center tug having a towline 66 ft longer than
those of the others. The rest of 1941 was punctuated by fantastic
accidents, near-accidents and amazing escapes, on one occasion
with the glider doing a tight turn away from the snapped-cable
tugs, with rockets firing and one wingtip almost touching the
ground. Another scheme was to fix the three twin-engined fighters
to the glider itself, one above the fuselage and the others under
the wings, disconnecting only near the destination.
In the event, Heinkel produced the five-engined He 111Z twin-fuselage
tug, and Messerschmitt's Leipheim and Obertraubhng factories delivered
50 Me 321As and 100 dual Me 321Bs. These saw much action (but
never invaded Malta or many other planned targets, and were also
too late to help at Stalingrad).
The decision had been taken years earlier, in
March 1941, to build a Gigant with engines. Inevitably this would
carry much less, because its empty weight would be some 2.5 times
greater. In many ways the glider was superior, but while it would
have been ideal (with adequate tugs) for a one-time assault on
the UK, it was less than satisfactory for the ongoing war in
which
it found itself, where trucking had to be done on a sustained
basis from Marseilles to the Volga. There was no way an Me 321
could 'go round again' when approaching an overcrowded airfield,
once at rest it was almost impossible to move, and staging points
had to have special crews with masses of concentrated hydrogen
peroxide for the rockets, drag chutes, tow cables and many other
special items.
Settling on the 14-cylinder Le Rhone 14N 48/49 engine with a takeoff rating of 1,140 hp, Messerschmitt had built 198 examples of the Me-323, as the powered version was known, by April 1944. The powered Gigant performed its transport function fairly well, but in spite of defensive weaponry as powerful as two 20mm MG151 cannons in wing turrets and eight 13mm MG151 machine guns on the Me-323E-2, the floundering behemoth proved to be highly vulnerable to attack by Allied fighters-and on some occasions, even twin-engine bombers.
The powered Me 323 was studied with many types of engine, and
the choice fell on the least powerful, the French Gnome-Rhone
14N. This was because the engine installation and propeller of
the Bloch 175 bomber was readily available and in production already,
and could just be bolted to a strengthened Gigant wing. Six engines
were needed, the left trio being GR14N 48s and the right trio
GRI4N 49s rotating in the opposite direction. A flight engineer
cabin was
added
An Me 321A-1 glider is towed into the air at Leipheim by a Troikaschlepp
of Bf 11CC tugs. The Gigant's landing gear, jettisoned after take-off,
and the booster rockets underwing in each leading edge between
the inner and middle engines, and a completely new multi-wheel
permanent landing gear was added. This, like the aircraft itself,
showed the way to the 'high flotation' gears of today.
The tailskid was then off the ground,
and with correct center of gravity position a man could reach
up and pull the tailskid down to the ground. Pictures show that
often the center of gravity was too far aft, the skid then being
firmly on the ground. This excellent gear rode over atrocious
front-line 'airfields', and pneumatic brakes could pull up a full-load
landing in under 656 ft.
The Me 323 first prototype had only four engines, and was the
prototype of a proposed Me 323C which needed the Troikasclilepp
at take-off with full load, but which could then fly back empty
unaided. This remained a one-off, and the Me 323 V2 with six engines
proved the prototype of the Me 323D production version. Although
the Me 323D was not easy to fly, its production was not delayed,
and both Leipheim and Obertraubling were delivering by September
1942, just in time for the Tunisian campaign. Two Jo 52 Gruppen
were converted into KGzbV 323, which at first led a charmed life
despite having to shuttle between Sicily and North Africa in daylight.
The only defensive armament in the Me 323D comprised two 7.92-mm
MG 15 machine-guns in cockpits on each side behind the wing, although
troops could fire six MG 34 or MG 42 army weapons from the side
windows. Once the aircraft reached the Mediterranean a lot more
firepower was needed. The nose-door guns were changed for 13-mm
MG 131s and a second pair was added lower down in each door, and
new aircraft received a forward dorsal cockpit with machine guns
firing to front and rear.

The planned Me 323G, with six 1.320-hp
GR14R engines, was halted when the Me 323 V17 prototype was incomplete.
There were many planned developments, including an extraordinary
proposal for a twinned Me 323 joined by a new center section and
with nine BMW 801 engines. Unconnected with development of the
aircraft itself was the brief project at Karlshagen armament establishment,
which had a bomb weighing 39,022 lb. The Me 323 appeared to be
the only aircraft able to carry it, and a single test flight was
made in July 1944. How the bomb was carried is not recorded, but
the Gigant (which is thought to have been damaged in a strafing
attack beforehand) broke up in the air.
![]() Use these views if you're planning on bashing your Fiddlers Green Me-323. You can see a few thousand German engineers were kept busy trying to perfect the Me-323 |
![]() This is a great view of the Gigant main landing gear, cover and the wing strut. Along each side were a tandem-wheel front truck and a main gear with three larger wheels. All wheels were sprung by massive levers and coil springs to hold the Me 323 level no matter what the load was on board. When empty, however, that oil drum (shown above and included with model) was needed to support the tail |
![]() Flying slow and low, the Me-323 was quite impressive. The ultimate goal of the Gigant was to invade England, and then later, possibly the US. Although an intercontential rocket (A-9) was on the drawing board. Click image for larger size.. ![]() |
![]() Haul a Panzer? No problem for the Me-323. Look at the expression in its' 'eyes' (canopy) |
![]() |